<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Full Table Scan - Column-oriented</title>
    <link>http://www.fulltablescan.com/</link>
    <description>The fix for the database junkie in you</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@fulltablescan.com" />
    <generator>Serendipity 1.6.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>spam-me-not-tom@fulltablescan.com</managingEditor>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:19:12 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Holy Missing the Point, Batman!</title>
    <link>http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/74-Holy-Missing-the-Point,-Batman!.html</link>
            <category>Column-oriented</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/74-Holy-Missing-the-Point,-Batman!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.fulltablescan.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=74</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulltablescan.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=74</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>tom@fulltablescan.com (Tom)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206901052&quot;  title=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206901052&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; otherwise uninteresting article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Our clients say, &#039;My god, is [query] performance worth sacrificing all the other gains&#039;&quot; of traditional database systems. They include ... the enterprise&#039;s existing investment in trained database administrators...&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holding on to a technology because you&#039;ve already trained people to use it is what I call &quot;growing dinosaurs&quot;.  It makes  understandable short-term sense, but anyone using it as a serious long-term justification is in big, T-rex-size trouble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for the record, the other reasons to stick with existing database systems that are listed in the article are all short-term maturity problems, not serious fundamental flaws.  I wonder how IBM and others will attempt to downplay column-oriented systems in a few years when all those wrinkles have been ironed out... 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:55:24 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/74-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>