<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Full Table Scan - EnterpriseDB</title>
    <link>http://www.fulltablescan.com/</link>
    <description>The fix for the database junkie in you</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@fulltablescan.com" />
    <generator>Serendipity 1.6.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>spam-me-not-tom@fulltablescan.com</managingEditor>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:44:40 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Asked and Answered: Dataupia and EnterpriseDB Compatibility</title>
    <link>http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/99-Asked-and-Answered-Dataupia-and-EnterpriseDB-Compatibility.html</link>
            <category>Dataupia</category>
            <category>EnterpriseDB</category>
            <category>ParAccel</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/99-Asked-and-Answered-Dataupia-and-EnterpriseDB-Compatibility.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.fulltablescan.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=99</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.fulltablescan.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=99</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>tom@fulltablescan.com (Tom)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.it-director.com/technology/data_mgmt/content.php?cid=10431&quot;  title=&quot;http://www.it-director.com/technology/data_mgmt/content.php?cid=10431&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;, Phillip Howard asks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;...here&#039;s an interesting question: if EnterpriseDB&#039;s main claim to fame is that you can run Oracle applications without change against Postgres Plus Advanced Server; and if Dataupia makes the same claim with respect to data warehousing, then can you run Dataupia against Postgres Plus Advanced Server?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m no Dataupia expert, but it seems pretty clear to me that the answer is no.  The reason is very simple: EnterpriseDB&#039;s offering is a stand-alone database system that &lt;em&gt;acts like&lt;/em&gt; Oracle, while Dataupia&#039;s system is a transparent system &lt;em&gt;accessed through&lt;/em&gt; Oracle.  (Or others, but I shan&#039;t spill any specific beans.)  Both are Oracle compatible, just not in the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And for that matter, ParAccel will be able to make the same claim (Oracle compatibility) before too long.  Yet they achieve it in an entirely different way - query routing with their &quot;AMIGO mode&quot; option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: Not all Oracle-compatible systems are compatible in the same way.  Don&#039;t get carried away with possible combinations. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:15:15 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fulltablescan.com/index.php?/archives/99-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>